South Africa: Competition Tribunal Support SAFLII

You are here:  SAFLII >> Databases >> South Africa: Competition Tribunal >> 2002 >> [2002] ZACT 55

| Noteup | LawCite

Armgold / Harmony Freegold Joint Venture Company (Pty) Ltd and St Helena Gold Mines Limited (54/LM/Aug02) [2002] ZACT 55 (10 October 2002)

Download original files

PDF format

RTF format


COMPETITION TRIBUNAL

REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA



Case No: 54/LM/Aug02





In the large merger between:


Armgold/ Harmony Freegold Joint Venture Company (Pty) Ltd


and


St Helena Gold Mines Limited


_______________________________________________________________________


Reasons for Decision

_______________________________________________________________________


Approval


On 23 September 2002 we unconditionally approved the merger between Armgold / Harmony Freegold Joint Venture Company (Pty) Ltd (“Freegold”) St Helena Gold Mines Limited (“St Helena”). Our reasons for this decision are set out below.


The transaction


This is an acquisition by Freegold of the St. Helena Mine, as a going concern.


The primary acquiring firm is Freegold, a joint venture company between Harmony Gold and ArmGold.


The primary target firm is the St. Helena Mine, which is controlled by a wholly owned subsidiary of Gold Fields Ltd.


The acquisition is intended as part of Freegold’s consolidation process of the gold mines in the Free State region and follows other acquisitions previously approved by the Tribunal. The parties submit that this will improve regional stability and that the transaction will enable the transformation of the St. Helena Mine into a low cost, high productivity producer and will ultimately extend its lifespan.




Evaluating the merger


The relevant market


The primary business of the parties to the transaction is the mining and processing of gold. It is common cause that the relevant market is the international market for the production and supply of gold and that is not a concentrated market.


Effect on competition


As noted in previous decisions, a single producer of gold is precluded from influencing the price of gold in the international market, largely because the price is contingent on various extraneous factors.1


Within this market, of which the merged entity’s post merger market share will remain relatively small, participants are faced with an international price and are essentially price takers. Thus, the transaction is unlikely to substantially lessen or restrict competition in the market.


Public interest Issues


Although the transaction will result in a maximum of 600 job losses, the lifespan of the mine will be extended for a further two years. As a result, it is expected that the number of man years worked will increase by 36%.


The transaction does not raise any other public interest issues.


We agree with the Commission’s recommendation that the transaction be unconditionally approved.






10 October 2002

N. Manoim Date



Concurring: D. Lewis, P. Maponya



1 See Tribunal Cases: Harmony Gold Mining Company Limited and Randfontein Estates Limited 16/LM/Feb00; Franco-Nevada Mining Corporation Ltd and Gold Fields Ltd 77/LM/Jul00 and Randfontein Estates Ltd and Anglovaal Ltd 03/LM/Jan01.