SAFLII Note: Certain personal/private details of parties or witnesses have been redacted from this document in compliance with the law and SAFLII Policy	

IN THE NORTH GAUTENG HIGH COURT, PRETORIA 
(REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA)
Case No: 51384/2012
Date: 29 April 2014
In the matter between:
THE SHERIFF OF THE HIGH COURT
RUSTENBURG..................................................................................................................................Applicant
and
MOTLAGOILWE DINTOE.......................................................................................Respondent/Purchaser
(ID NO: 7[...])
In Re -
THE STANDARD BANK OF SOUTH AFRICA LTD.....................................................................Plaintiff
and
JUSTUS ALFRED THEODOOR BOSWEL.........................................................................First Defendant
MERCIA BOSWEL.............................................................................................................Second Defendant
(ID NO: 5[...])
JUDGMENT
JANSE VAN NIEUWENHUIZEN J
[1] This is an application in terms of the provisions of rule 46(11) of the Uniform rules of court.
[2] In terms of the rule, the sheriff should file a report and an application, which result in the incurring of unnecessary costs, is not necessary. [See: Sheriff, Hiabisa and Nongoma y Shobeka 2009 (6) SA 272 (KZN)].
ORDER
In the premises, I make the following order:
1. An order is granted in terms of prayers 1 and 2 of the notice of motion.
2. “The deposit shall be retained in trust by the Sheriff until such time as the aforesaid property has been sold to a third party and an aggrieved creditor’s loss has been quantified and judgment has been granted in respect thereof as intended by the provisions of Rule 46(11)(b).
3. Prayers 3, 5 and 6 is dismissed.

JANSE VAN NIEUWENHUIZEN J
JUDGE OF THE GAUTENG HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA