South Africa: North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria

You are here:
SAFLII >>
Databases >>
South Africa: North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria >>
2016 >>
[2016] ZAGPPHC 359
| Noteup
| LawCite
In re: Inquest No 33/2015 Deceased Dr Hashim Ebrahim (33/2015) [2016] ZAGPPHC 359 (23 May 2016)
Download original files |
REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA
GAUTENG DIVISION, PRETORIA
23/5/2016
A308/2016
HIGH COURT REFERENCE NO: 149/16
MAGISTRATE'S COURT CASE NO: 33/2015
JUDGE'S CHAMBERS
NORTH GAUTENG HIGH COURT
Reportable: No
Of interest to other judges: No
Revised.
IN re: Inquest No 33/2015: Deceased Dr Hashim Ebrahim
SPECIAL REVIEW JUDGMENT
BASSON, J
1. Request for a special review: This was a request for a special review of the informal inquest findings of suicide handed down by Magistrate Mr P Louwrens on 20 April 2016.
2. In arriving at a conclusion, the Magistrate considered the statements of, inter alia, the neighbour (who was at the scene), the paramedic (who arrived at the scene whilst the deceased was still alive), the statements by members of the South African Police Services and the statement of Dr van der Nest (who conducted the post-mortem) and SMS messages. The Magistrate concluded that no one was responsible for the death of the deceased and that the cause of his death was suicide.
3. On behalf of the parents of the deceased it was submitted that an irregularity had occurred during the proceedings and that further affidavits and documents were not taken into account in arriving at a conclusion. The parents of the deceased maintained that the deceased was murdered.
4. After receipt of the findings, the parents of the deceased requested a special review of the inquest findings in this matter.
5. I have considered the record of the proceedings and I am satisfied that the Presiding Magistrate correctly came to the conclusion that the cause of death of the deceased was suicide. I am further not persuaded that the Presiding Magistrate had excluded material affidavits and documentary evidence in arriving at a conclusion. It is clear from the record that the Magistrate did in fact consider those documents but have decided that they are irrelevant.
6. In the premises I make the following order:
The request of a special review is dismissed.
___________________
AC Basson
Judge of the High Court
I concur and it is so ordered:
__________________
CJ Van der Westhuizen
Acting - Judge of the High Court