REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA
(GAUTENG  DIVISION, PRETORIA)
28/01/2016
CASE NO: 23846/2014
NOT REPORTABLE
NOT OF INTEREST TO OTHER JUDGES

In the matter between:

MOGABUDIMA TRANSPORT SERVICES CC SE MOGOWE 	1st Applicant
J MOGOWE 	2nd Applicant
ME NCHABELENG 	3rd Applicant
JM SEPHEU 	4th Applicant
MP NCHABELENG 	5th Applicant
GJ MTHOBENI 	6th Applicant
MF NTSOANE 	7th Applicant
SD RANALA 	8th Applicant
OL MOTAU 	9th Applicant
RS SELLO 	10th Applicant
ME LEPELLE 	11th Applicant
KT CHOMA 	12th Applicant
MJ KGATUKE 	13th Applicant
MB PHASHA 	14th Applicant

And

THE GAUTENG PROVINCIAL REGULATORY ENTITY 	1st Respondent
THE LIMPOPO PROVINCIAL REGULATORY ENTITY 	2nd Respondent
THE REGISTRAR OF TRANSPORT,
GAUTENG  PROVINCE 	3rd Respondent
THE REGISTRAR OF TRANSPORT, 
LIMPOPO PROVINCE 	4th Respondent
BOSEKA BOEJA TAXI ASSOCIATION 	5th Respondent
MASEMOLA TAXI ASSOCIATION 	6th Respondent
MV SEPHEU 	7th Respondent
SEFOKA MAKUWE ADAM 	8th Respondent
NCHABELENG  DITEDI MAXWELL 	9th Respondent
TLADI FRANS 	10th Respondent
MA MOKGWADI 	11th Respondent

JUDGMENT

MALI AJ

[1] This is an application for an order to rescind, alternatively to declare void and unenforceable the verdict issued by the third and fourth respondents on 18 July 2012. The application further seeks the following:

1.1.	an order directing the third respondent to reinstate the First applicants as members of the fifth respondent; and
1.2.	an order directing the third respondent to reinstate the applicants as members of the fifth respondent and to renew their permits which they were entitled to as members of the fifth respondent.

[2] There was no appearance on behalf of all the applicants. I am satisfied that the notice of set down was served upon the applicants on 12 October 2015.

[3] Counsel, Mr Gwarha appeared on behalf of the 1st, 2nd, 3rd and 4th respondents. Counsel, Mr Morare appeared on behalf of 5th and 11th respondent.

[4] There was no appearance on behalf of 6th, 7th, 8th, 9th and the 10th respondent.

[5] Having heard Counsel the application is dismissed with costs.

5.1	Applicants are ordered to pay costs of 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th 5th and 11th respondents on attorney and client scale.

MALI AJ ACTING JUDGE OF THE HIGH COURT

Counsel for the Applicants: Instructed by:
No appearance No appearance

Counsel for 1st, 2nd, 3rd and 4th Respondents: 	MR GWARHU 
Counsel for 5 and 11 th Respondents:			RAMUSHU MORARE INC.

Date of Hearing: 14 October 2015
Date of Judgment: 29 January 2016