IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA
GAUTENG DIVISION, PRETORIA

(1)	REPORTABLE: YES/NO
(2)	OF INTEREST TO OTHER JUDGES: YES/NO
(3)	REVISED.

CASE NO.: 58679/2018
11/12/2019

In the matter between:

FOOD AND ALLIED WORKERS' UNION	Excipient/Second Defendant

and

UMBHABA ESTATES (PTY) LTD		Respondent/Plaintiff

JUDGMENT
VAN DER WESTHUIZEN, J
[1]	In this matter I delivered a written judgment on 5 December 2019. My attention has been drawn to the fact that I did not in the order I granted afford the respondent/plaintiff an opportunity of amending its particulars of claim, should it be so advised.
[2]	In terms of the provisions of Rule 42 of the Uniform Rules of Court, I am authorised to amend my order mero motu where there is an ambiguity or omission contained therein.
[3]	I hereby amend the order granted on 5 December 2019 by adding a paragraph 4 that reads as follows:
“The respondent/plaintiff is granted leave to amend its amended particulars of claim, if so advised, within 7 (seven) days of the date of this order.”

[4]	In view thereof that the 7 days may have expired by the time of this addition to the order of 5 December 2019, the time for an amendment to the order of 5 December 2019 will run from the date of this amending order.
[5]	I am advised that the excipient/ second defendant apparently has no objection to the grant of this amendment to the order of 5 December 2019.

I grant the following order:

1.	The order of 5 December 2019 is amended in the following manner:
"4.	The respondent/plaintiff is granted leave to amend its amended particulars of claim, if so advised, within 7 (seven) days of the date of this order.”

2.	The seven days will run from the date of this order.

C J VAN DER WESTHUIZEN
JUDGE OF THE HIGH COURT

On behalf of Excipient/Second Defendant: 		TMG Euijen SC
Instructed by: 						Cheadle Thompson & 
Haysom Inc.

On behalf of Respondent:					 EC Labuschagne SC 
SG Maritz
Instructed by:						Adams & Adams Attorneys