South Africa: North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria Support SAFLII

You are here:  SAFLII >> Databases >> South Africa: North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria >> 2023 >> [2023] ZAGPPHC 2025

| Noteup | LawCite

City of Tshwane Metropolitan Municipality v Malvigenix NPC t/a Wecanwin and Others [2023] ZAGPPHC 2025; 90433/2018 (10 May 2023)

 

IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA

(GAUTENG DIVISION, PRETORIA)

 

Case Number:  90433/2018

REPORTABLE: NO

OF INTEREST TO OTHER JUDGES: NO

REVISED

Date: 2023-05-10

 

In the matter between:

 

CITY OF TSHWANE METROPOLITAN MUNICIPALITY

Applicant

 


and


 


MALVIGENIX NPC t/a WECANWIN

First Respondent

 


PIETER NICOLAAS GROBLER

Second Respondent



ANNA ELLISSABETH GROBLER

Third Respondent



ETHEL MARGARET COETZEE

Fourth Respondent



MARTHA MARGARETHA DU PLESIS

Fifth Respondent



JOHANNES JACOBUS LOMBARD

Sixth Respondent



RESEANE KAIZER HUMPHRY MAKOLE

Seventh Respondent



YVONNE GOOD

Eighth Respondent



LYNN EAST PROP (PTY) LTD

Ninth Respondent



DIANA EDIT GEORGIADES

Tenth Respondent



FREDIERIK JACKOBUS VAN DER SANDE

Eleventh Respondent



JEANNE LOUISE VAN DER SANDE

Twelfth Respondent



EDMOUR MARCHAND

Thirteenth Respondent



NADIA MARCHAND

Fourteenth Respondent



MARC RICHARD TRUMAN N.O.

Fifteenth Respondent



GREGORY JOHN BOUWER

Sixteenth Respondent



CORNELIA JOHANNA BOUWER

Seventeenth Respondent



CHARLES KGOMOTSO TSOKU

Eighteenth Respondent


JUDGMENT: APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL

 

POTTERILL J

 

[1]      I have listened to the parties and have read the papers.  I think for compelling reasons, leave to appeal can be granted.

 

[2]      I pondered this.  I think it is something that the Supreme Court of Appeal can look at so I will grant leave to appeal.  I don’t think the judgment was necessarily wrong, but I think the subject matter attracts attention from a higher court.

 

[3]      The application for leave to appeal is granted to the Supreme Court of Appeal.  Costs are to be costs in the appeal.

 

S. POTTERILL

JUDGE OF THE HIGH COURT

 

CASE NO:  90433/2018

 

HEARD ON:

01/10/23

 


FOR THE APPLICANT:

ADV. T. STRYDOM SC


ADV. L. KOTZE

 


INSTRUCTED BY:

Mothle Jooma Sabdia Incorporated

 


FOR THE RESPONDENT:

ADV. N. FERREIRA


ADV. A. MOLVER

 


INSTRUCTED BY:

Adams & Adams

 


DATE OF JUDGMENT:

01/10/23

 


DATE OF JUDGMENT DISTRIBUTED TO PARTIES:

05/10/23