South Africa: Labour Court

You are here:
SAFLII >>
Databases >>
South Africa: Labour Court >>
2002 >>
[2002] ZALC 112
| Noteup
| LawCite
Mkhwanazi v Commission for Conciliation, Mediation and Arbitration and Others (JR1594/01) [2002] ZALC 112 (5 February 2002)
Download original files |
Sneller Verbatim/ssl
IN THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA
HELD AT BRAAMFONTEIN
CASE NO: JR1594/01
2002-02-05
In the matter between
M MKHWANAZI Applicant
and
COMMISSION FOR CONCILIATION
MEDIATION AND ARBITRATION 1ST Respondent
ABE MATHEBULA 2ND Respondent
JOSIAH MATHEBULA 3RD Respondent
________________________________________________________________
J U D G M E N T ________________________________________________________________
REVELAS J:
1. The applicant, Maria Mkhwanazi, who is the former employer of the second and third respondents owns a taxi business. A dispute arising from alleged operational requirements arose between the parties and the matter was referred to the Commission for Conciliation Mediation and Arbitration which did not have jurisdiction to hear such matters, nonetheless conciliated the matter and a settlement agreement was reached under its auspices.
1. 2. It is argued on behalf of the applicant that because the CCMA did not have jurisdiction to conciliate the matter the agreement derived in terms thereof should be set aside.
3. An agreement reached under those circumstances should not necessarily be set aside for lack of jurisdiction, but the dispute was such that the Commissioner who tried to conciliate the matter made input that is required from Commissioners in such circumstances. These may not have been correct because the Commissioner was not supposed to deal with such matters, or is precluded to deal with such matters. This per se is not fatal to the proses.
4. Furthermore there is undisputed evidence that the applicant felt that she was manipulated to a certain extent to sign the agreement. She also expressed her doubts about the objectivity of the Commissioner who conducted the proceedings. This is also not disputed by the employees in this matter.
5. In the circumstances the agreement dated on 29 August 2000 reached between the parties hereto is set aside.
_________________
E. Revelas