IN THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA
HELD IN JOHANNESBURG
NOT REPORTABLE
                                                     	   			CASE NO: JR 113/08
In the matter between:       
AMANDLA TOKWE						APPLICANT
and
BONGE MASOTE N.O.					1ST RESPONDENT
COMMISSION FOR CONCILIATION
MEDIATION AND ARBITRATION 			2ND RESPONDENT
SOUTH AFRICAN BROADCASTING 
CORPORATION LIMITED					3RD RESPONDENT                                                            
JUDGMENT            

Molahlehi J
[1] This is an application for leave to appeal against my judgment handed down on 27th February 2009, in which I reviewed and set aside the arbitration award issued by the first respondent under case number GAJB18159-07 dated 29th November 2007 with costs. This matter was considered only on the written submissions made by the parties.
[2] The third respondent in this application for leave to appeal has raised several grounds for leave to appeal. I do not deem it necessary to repeat those grounds in this judgment.
[3] In terms of s166(1) of the Labour Relations  Act 66 of 1995 (the Act) a party wishing to appeal to the Labour Appeal Court against a judgment of the Labour Court has to obtain leave to do so from the Labour Court. The test to apply when considering whether or not to grant leave to appeal is whether there is a reasonable prospect that another Court may come to a different conclusion to that of the Labour Court.
[4] I have carefully considered the grounds for leave to appeal as set out in the application for leave to appeal to the Labour Appeal Court. I have also considered my judgment including the written submissions made by both parties. I am not persuaded that another Court may come to a different conclusion to the one reached by me in my judgment.
[5] In the circumstances the following order is made:

(i) The application for leave to appeal to the Labour Appeal Court against the whole judgment is dismissed.
(ii) There is no order as to costs.

_______________
Molahlehi J
Date of Judgment:	30th October 2009
Appearances
(Leave to appeal decided on papers)