South Africa: Cape Town Labour Court, Cape Town Support SAFLII

You are here:  SAFLII >> Databases >> South Africa: Cape Town Labour Court, Cape Town >> 2017 >> [2017] ZALCCT 31

| Noteup | LawCite

Dorey v TSB Sugar RSA Ltd (JS287/12) [2017] ZALCCT 31 (30 June 2017)

Download original files

PDF format

RTF format


IN THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA, CAPE TOWN

Not Reportable

case no: JS 287/12

In the matter between:

MADELINE DOREY                                                                                               Applicant

and

TSB SUGAR RSA LTD                                                                                     Respondent

 

Heard: 22 June 2017 (In Chambers)

Delivered: 30 June 2017

 

Summary: Application for leave to appeal. The test remains that of reasonable prospects that another court may arrive at a different conclusion. Held: (1) The application for leave to appeal is dismissed with costs.

 

JUDGMENT-LEAVE TO APPEAL

 

MOSHOANA, AJ

 

Introduction

[1] This is an application for leave to appeal against the whole judgment and order of this court handed down on 03 May 2017. The application is opposed.

 

Background facts

[2] The applicant, Ms Dorey was charged and dismissed for alleged misconduct. The applicant considered her dismissal to be in contravention of the Protected Disclosure Act and accordingly automatically unfair. She approached this court for relief. After a protracted trial, this court concluded that her dismissal is automatically unfair and granted her maximum compensation. The respondent, TSB Sugar was aggrieved thereby and launched the present application for leave to appeal.

 

Evaluation

[3] The test whether leave to appeal should be granted remains that spelled out in section 17(1) of the Superior Courts Act[1]. If an applicant fails to meet the test, like the applicant before me, leave should be refused. I have carefully considered the applicant’s grounds for leave to appeal and I am firmly of the view that there are no reasonable prospects that another court may come to a different conclusion.

[4] Accordingly, I conclude that the application should fail.

 

Order

[4] In the results, I make the following order:

1. The application for leave to appeal is hereby dismissed.

2. The respondent, TSB Sugar is to pay the costs.

 

_______________________

GN Moshoana

Acting Judge of the Labour Court of South Africa

 

Appearances

For the Applicant: S Lancaster of Lancaster Kungoane Attorneys, Centurion.

For the Respondent: Adv O Mooki, instructed by Norton Rose Fulbright SA Inc, Sandton.


[1] Act 10 of 2013. See Seathlolo and Another v CEPPWAWU and others [2016] 37 ILJ 1485 (LC)