South Africa: Durban Labour Court, Durban Support SAFLII

You are here:  SAFLII >> Databases >> South Africa: Durban Labour Court, Durban >> 2007 >> [2007] ZALCD 9

| Noteup | LawCite

Msomi v Commission for Conciliation Mediation And Arbitration and Others (D694/05) [2007] ZALCD 9 (19 March 2007)

Download original files

PDF format

RTF format


IN THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA

HELD IN DURBAN

                                                                                                       CASE NO D694/05

IN THE MATTER BETWEEN:

THOKOZANI MICHAEL MSOMI                                                                             APPLICANT

and

COMMISSION FOR CONCILIATION,

MEDIATION AND ARBITRATION                                                          FIRST RESPONDENT

NHLANHLA MATHE                                                                          SECOND RESPONDENT

SOUTH AFRICAN REVENUE SERVICES                                             THIRD RESPONDENT

JUDGMENT

19 MARCH 2007

PILLAY D, J   This is an application to review and set aside the award of the second respondent Commissioner.  The applicant was charged for being absent from duty without proper authorisation.  The second charge appears to be a duplication of the first, in that through his absence he prejudiced the administration, discipline and efficiency of the South African Revenue Service, the employer.

The employee admitted to being absent from duty for the time alleged, which was about seven days.  He denied that he prejudiced the administration, discipline and efficiency of SARS.

The arbitrator's reasoning is based squarely on the evidence before him.  It was common cause that the employee had absented himself and that when he had done so, he had informed his supervisor on two occasions that he had been "sleeping and drinking."  The simple fact of employment is that an employee who does not turn up for work must expect to be disciplined and if his misconduct persists, there is a good chance that he will be dismissed.  The applicant had been aware of this rule.  He had transgressed it previously and had been warned.  His contention is that the warning had expired and he should not have been dismissed on this occasion, but should have been given a written warning.

There was no obligation on the employer to constantly give written warnings for repeated offences, even if the old warnings have expired.  There is a limit to which absenteeism can be tolerated.  It is not as though the employee was not aware of the consequences of his actions.  In any

event, none of the information and none of the grounds on which the award is challenged enable the Court to set aside the award on review.  

In the circumstances, arbitration is final and binding and is reviewable on the limited basis set out in section 145 of the Labour Relations Act, No 66 of 1995.  In the circumstances, the application for review is DISMISSED.

______________

Pillay D, J

Date Edited: 8 August 2008

 

Appearances:

ON BEHALF OF APPLICANT :                 In person                                                  



ON BEHALF OF RESPONDENTS :         No appearance                                       

 

IN THE LABOUR COURT  OF SOUTH AFRICA

 

HELD AT DURBAN

 

CASE NO                                                  :                                                     D694/05

 

DATE                                                         :                                      19 MARCH 2007

T M MSOMI

 

versus

 

SARS & ANOTHER



BEFORE THE HONOURABLE MADAM JUSTICE PILLAY



ON BEHALF OF APPLICANT                :                                               IN PERSON



ON BEHALF OF RESPONDENT           :                             NOT REPRESENTED



INTERPRETER                                         :                                       NOT REQUIRED



 

EXTRACT

Judgment



REPORT ON RECORDING

CLEAR

 

 

CONTRACTOR

Sneller Recordings (Pty) Ltd. Durban 103 Jan Hofmeyr Road Westville 3630

Tel 031 2665452 Fax 031 2665459

 

CERTIFICATE OF VERACITY

 

This is, to the best abilities of the transcriber, a true and correct transcript of the proceedings, where audible, recorded by means of a mechanical recorder in the matter:

 

T M MSOMI v SARS & ANOTHER



CASE NO                                                  :                                                     D694/05



COURT OF ORIGIN                                  :                                                   DURBAN



TRANSCRIBER                                        :                                                S VILJOEN



DATE COMPLETED                               :                                           16 JULY 2008



NO OF CDs                                              :                                                           1 CD



NO OF PAGES                                         :                                                                10