South Africa: Limpopo High Court, Polokwane

You are here:
SAFLII >>
Databases >>
South Africa: Limpopo High Court, Polokwane >>
2023 >>
[2023] ZALMPPHC 52
| Noteup
| LawCite
Balobedu Ba Modjadji Traditional Council and Others v Phillia and Others (6043/2020) [2023] ZALMPPHC 52 (10 July 2023)
Download original files |
REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA
(LIMPOPO DIVISION, POLOKWANE)
CASE №: 6043/2020
NOT REPORTABLE
NOT OF INTEREST TO OTHER JUDGES
REVISED
20.07.23
In the matter between:
BALOBEDU BA MODJADJI TRADITIONAL COUNCIL
|
FIRST APPLICANT |
REGENT MPAPATLA THABISANANG MODJADJI
|
SECOND APPLICANT |
LEON MATETA
|
THIRD APPLICANT |
LETTY HLANGWANA
|
FOURTH APPLICANT |
V
|
|
HOSI TINYIKO LWANDLAMUNI PHILLIA
|
FIRST RESPONDENT |
NWMITWA-SHILUBANA BALOYI TRIBAL AUTHORITY
|
SECOND RESPONDENT |
MINISTER OF RURAL DEVELOPMENT AND LAND REFORM
|
THIRD RESPONDENT |
CHIEF DIRECTOR: LIMPOPO SHAREDSERVICES CENTRE, PROVINCIAL DEPARTMENT OF RURAL DEVELOPMENT AND LAND REFORM, LIMPOPO
|
FOURTH RESPONDENT |
CHIEF DIRECTOR: LIMPOPO SHARED SERVICES CENTRE, PROVINCIAL DEPARTMENT OF CO-OPERATIVE GOVERNANCE, HUMAN SETTLEMENT AND TRADITIONAL AFFAIRS
|
FIFTH RESPONDENT |
In Re
|
|
HOSI TINYIKO LWANDLAMUNI PHILLIA
|
FIRST APPLICANT |
NWMITWA-SHILUBANA BALOYI TRIBAL AUTHORITY
|
SECOND APPLICANT |
V
|
|
BALOBEDU BA MODJADJI TRADITIONAL COUNCIL
|
FIRST RESPONDENT |
REGENT MPAPATLA THABISANANG MODJADJI
|
SECOND RESPONDENT |
LEON MATETA
|
THIRD RESPONDENT |
LETTY HLANGWANA
|
FOURTH RESPONDENT |
MINISTER OF RURAL DEVELOPMENT AND LAND REFORM
|
FIFTH RESPONDENT |
CHIEF DIRECTOR: LIMPOPO SHARED SERVICES CENTRE, PROVINCIAL DEPARTMENT OF RURAL DEVELOPMENT AND LAND REFORM, LIMPOPO
|
SIXTH RESPONDENT |
CHIEF DIRECTOR: LIMPOPO SHARED SERVICES CENTRE, PROVINCIAL DEPARTMENT OF CO-OPERATIVE GOVERNANCE, HUMAN SETTLEMENT AND TRADITIONAL AFFAIRS |
SEVENTH RESPONDENT |
LEAVE TO APPEAL JUDGMENT
MANGENA AJ
[1] Applicants seek leave to appeal the whole judgment and orders of this court delivered on 21 January 2022. The application is unopposed.
[2] The application for leave to appeal was filed with the Registrar's office on 02 December 2022 accompanied by a condonation application.
[3] The Applicants explained the delay and attributed it to the fact that the judgment was never received by their attorneys until the 16 November 2022 when enquiries were made with the office of the Judge President.
[4] The condonation application is not opposed and the explanation proferred is acceptable. The issue need not detain us any longer than it is necessary. Condonation for the late filing of the application for leave to appeal is granted.
[5] The grounds for leave to appeal are set out in the notice of appeal and were amplified by the written and oral submissions.
[6] The applicants submitted that the dispute between the parties related to the boundary and therefore required to be resolved through a procedure prescribed in the Limpopo Traditional Leadership and Institutions Act 6 of 2005. This process required a Premier to make a determination and without his report, the court was not in a position to adjudicate on the matter.
[7] It was further argued on behalf of the Applicants that the court erred by disregarding a government gazette notice attached to the heads of argument. For this contention, counsel relied on Section 5 of the Civil Proceedings Evidence Act 25 of 1965 which provides that judicial notice shall be taken of any law or government notice or any matter that has been published in a gazette. It was submitted that had the court considered the gazette, it would not have arrived at the decision it took in particular, the order directing the respondents to return possession of the property to the Applicants.
[8] I have given due regard to the submissions and considered them in tandem with the orders made and regrettably, I am not persuaded that the orders made are susceptible to be overturned by another court. In my opinion the appeal would not have a reasonable prospect of success.
[9] It is ordered as follows:
1. Condonation is granted.
2. Application for leave to appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs.
MANGENA AJ
Acting Judge of the High Court
Limpopo Division, Polokwane
APPEARANCES:
HEARD ON : 29 June 2023
JUDGMENT DELIVERED ON : 20 July 2023. This judgment was handed down electronically by circulation to the parties’ representatives by email. The date and time for hand-down of the judgment is deemed to be 20 July 2023 at 12:00
FOR THE APPLICANT |
Mr. N Kubayi
|
INSTRUCTED BY |
Noveni Eddy Kubayi Inc
|
FOR THE RESPONDENT |
No Appearance
|
INSTRUCTED BY |
Thomas & Swanepoel Inc
|
FOR THE RESPONDENT |
No Appearance
|
INSTRUCTED BY |
State Attorney |