South Africa: Limpopo High Court, Polokwane Support SAFLII

You are here:  SAFLII >> Databases >> South Africa: Limpopo High Court, Polokwane >> 2023 >> [2023] ZALMPPHC 52

| Noteup | LawCite

Balobedu Ba Modjadji Traditional Council and Others v Phillia and Others (6043/2020) [2023] ZALMPPHC 52 (10 July 2023)

Download original files

PDF format

RTF format


REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA

IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA

(LIMPOPO DIVISION, POLOKWANE)

 

 CASE №: 6043/2020

NOT REPORTABLE

NOT OF INTEREST TO OTHER JUDGES

REVISED

20.07.23

 

In the matter between:


BALOBEDU BA MODJADJI TRADITIONAL COUNCIL


FIRST APPLICANT

REGENT MPAPATLA THABISANANG MODJADJI


SECOND APPLICANT

LEON MATETA


THIRD APPLICANT

LETTY HLANGWANA


FOURTH APPLICANT

V



HOSI TINYIKO LWANDLAMUNI PHILLIA


FIRST RESPONDENT

NWMITWA-SHILUBANA BALOYI TRIBAL AUTHORITY


SECOND RESPONDENT

MINISTER OF RURAL DEVELOPMENT AND LAND REFORM


THIRD RESPONDENT

CHIEF DIRECTOR: LIMPOPO SHAREDSERVICES CENTRE,

PROVINCIAL   DEPARTMENT OF RURAL DEVELOPMENT AND LAND REFORM,

LIMPOPO


FOURTH RESPONDENT

CHIEF DIRECTOR: LIMPOPO SHARED SERVICES CENTRE,

PROVINCIAL DEPARTMENT OF CO-OPERATIVE GOVERNANCE,

HUMAN SETTLEMENT AND TRADITIONAL AFFAIRS


FIFTH RESPONDENT

In Re



HOSI TINYIKO LWANDLAMUNI PHILLIA


FIRST APPLICANT

NWMITWA-SHILUBANA BALOYI TRIBAL AUTHORITY


SECOND APPLICANT

V



BALOBEDU BA MODJADJI TRADITIONAL COUNCIL


FIRST RESPONDENT

REGENT MPAPATLA THABISANANG MODJADJI


SECOND RESPONDENT

LEON MATETA


THIRD RESPONDENT

LETTY HLANGWANA


FOURTH RESPONDENT

MINISTER OF RURAL DEVELOPMENT AND LAND REFORM


FIFTH RESPONDENT

CHIEF DIRECTOR: LIMPOPO SHARED SERVICES CENTRE,

PROVINCIAL DEPARTMENT OF RURAL DEVELOPMENT AND LAND REFORM,

LIMPOPO


SIXTH RESPONDENT

CHIEF DIRECTOR: LIMPOPO SHARED SERVICES CENTRE,

PROVINCIAL DEPARTMENT OF CO-OPERATIVE GOVERNANCE, 

HUMAN SETTLEMENT AND TRADITIONAL AFFAIRS

SEVENTH RESPONDENT


LEAVE TO APPEAL JUDGMENT

 

MANGENA AJ

[1] Applicants seek leave to appeal the whole judgment and orders of this court delivered on 21 January 2022. The application is unopposed. 

 

[2] The application for leave to appeal was filed with the Registrar's office on 02 December 2022 accompanied by a condonation application.

 

[3] The Applicants explained the delay and attributed it to the fact that the judgment was never received by their attorneys until the 16 November 2022 when enquiries were made with the office of the Judge President.

 

[4] The condonation application is not opposed and the explanation proferred is acceptable. The issue need not detain us any longer than it is necessary.  Condonation for the late filing of the application for leave to appeal is granted.

 

[5] The grounds for leave to appeal are set out in the notice of appeal and were amplified by the written and oral submissions. 

 

[6] The applicants submitted that the dispute between the parties related to the boundary and therefore required to be resolved through a procedure prescribed in the Limpopo Traditional Leadership and Institutions Act 6 of 2005. This process required a Premier to make a determination and without his report, the court was not in a position to adjudicate on the matter. 

 

[7] It was further argued on behalf of the Applicants that the court erred by disregarding a government gazette notice attached to the heads of argument. For this contention, counsel relied on Section 5 of the Civil Proceedings Evidence Act 25 of 1965 which provides that judicial notice shall be taken of any law or government notice or any matter that has been published in a gazette. It was submitted that had the court considered the gazette, it would not have arrived at the decision it took in particular, the order directing the respondents to return possession of the property to the Applicants.

 

[8] I have given due regard to the submissions and considered them in tandem with the orders made and regrettably, I am not persuaded that the orders made are susceptible to be overturned by another court. In my opinion the appeal would not have a reasonable prospect of success.

 

[9] It is ordered as follows:

1. Condonation is granted.

2. Application for leave to appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs.

 

MANGENA AJ

Acting Judge of the High Court

Limpopo Division, Polokwane


APPEARANCES:

 

HEARD ON :   29 June  2023

 

JUDGMENT DELIVERED ON : 20 July 2023. This judgment was   handed down electronically by circulation to the parties’   representatives by email. The date and time for hand-down of the judgment is deemed to be    20 July 2023 at 12:00

 

FOR THE APPLICANT

Mr. N Kubayi


INSTRUCTED BY  

Noveni Eddy Kubayi Inc


FOR THE RESPONDENT  

No Appearance


INSTRUCTED BY  

Thomas & Swanepoel Inc


FOR THE RESPONDENT

No Appearance


INSTRUCTED BY

State Attorney