South Africa: Supreme Court of Appeal

You are here:
SAFLII >>
Databases >>
South Africa: Supreme Court of Appeal >>
2011 >>
[2011] ZASCA 126
| Noteup
| LawCite
Emergency Care Training Association v Health Professions Council of South Africa and Others (664/10) [2011] ZASCA 126 (9 September 2011)
Download original files |
THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEAL OF SOUTH AFRICA
JUDGMENT
Case No: 664/10
In the matter between:
EMERGENCY CARE TRAINING ASSOCIATION …....................................Appellant
and
HEALTH PROFESSIONS COUNCIL OF
SOUTH AFRICA …...........................................................................First Respondent
PROFESSIONAL BOARD FOR EMERGENCY CARE
PRACTITIONERS …...................................................................Second Respondent
CHAIRPERSON: PROFESSIONAL BOARD FOR
EMERGENCY CARE PRACTITIONERS …....................................Third Respondent
Neutral citation: Emergency Care Training Association v Health Professions
Council of South Africa (664/10) [2011] ZASCA 126 (9 September 2011).
Coram: CLOETE, SNYDERS, SHONGWE, SERITI and WALLIS JJA
Heard: 9 SEPTEMBER 2011
Delivered: 9 SEPTEMBER 2011
Summary:
_____________________________________________________________
ORDER
______________________________________________________________
On appeal from: North Gauteng High Court (Pretoria) (Kollapen J sitting as
court of first instance):
The appeal is dismissed. The appellant is ordered to pay the respondents' costs including the costs of two counsel.
______________________________________________________________
JUDGMENT
______________________________________________________________
CLOETE JA (SNYDERS, SHONGWE, SERITI and WALLIS JJA concurring):
[1] No decision was required by the court a quo as the undertakings given by some of the respondents in the answering affidavit rendered the relief sought unnecessary.
[2] A decision on the issues sought to be raised on appeal would have no practical effect or result.
[3] I would therefore exercise the discretion this court has in terms of s 21A of the Supreme Court Act, 59 of 1959, in favour of dismissing the appeal.
[4] The appeal is dismissed. The appellant is ordered to pay the respondents' costs including the costs of two counsel.
_______________
T D CLOETE
JUDGE OF APPEAL
APPEARANCES:
APPELLANTS: D S Fourie SC
Instructed by Hurter Spies Inc, Pretoria
Rossouw Attorneys, Bloemfontein
RESPONDENTS: M Chaskalson SC (with him Ms N J Jele)
Instructed by Gildenhuys Lessing Malatji Inc, Pretoria
Honey Attorneys, Bloemfontein