In the matter between:

and

sentence, according to your heads of argument, and the record as well, it would appear that a certain Mr Lingani appeared on behalf of the three accused, after they were convicted, and the point which was taken on behalf of the appellants was that Mr Lingani is not a lawyer as defined for purposes of admission, in as much as he has no right of appearance in Court, and therefore he is not a lawyer.

ORDER

Thank you. The order which we make in this matter is as follows:
1.	The conviction of all three appellants for murder is hereby confirmed;
2.	The sentence imposed on all three appellants is hereby set aside, the reason being that they were not properly legally represented as appears from the record.

I would like to warn the accused that if they don't meet those conditions, obviously the law will take its course. That is the order of Court.

I agree
				
				MATOJANE, A