South Africa: Western Cape High Court, Cape Town Support SAFLII

You are here:  SAFLII >> Databases >> South Africa: Western Cape High Court, Cape Town >> 2011 >> [2011] ZAWCHC 303

| Noteup | LawCite

Vusela Construction (Pty) Ltd v Volker and Others (13813/07) [2011] ZAWCHC 303 (29 July 2011)

Download original files

PDF format

RTF format

Republic of South Africa


IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA

(WESTERN CAPE HIGH COURT, CAPE TOWN)



Case Number: 13813/07



In the matter of:


VUSELA CONSTRUCTION (PTY) LTD ….......................................................First Applicant

and

LEONARD THEODOR VOLKER …............................................................First Respondent


THE PREMIER OF THE WESTERN CAPE ….......................................Second Respondent

JOHANNES H LOUW …............................................................................Third Respondent

THE ROAD ACCIDENT FUND …............................................................Fourth Respondent


PREMIER OF THE WESTERN CAPE …....................................................Second Applicant

and

LEONARD THEODOR VOLKER …............................................................First Respondent

VUSELA CONSTRUCTION (PTY) LTD ….............................................Second Respondent

JOHANNES H LOUW …............................................................................Third Respondent

THE ROAD ACCIDENT FUND …............................................................Fourth Respondent



In re:

LEONARD THEODOR VOLKER …............................................................................Plaintiff

And

THE PREMIER OF THE WESTERN CAPE …........................................First Respondent

VUSELA CONSTRUCTION (PTY) LTD ….............................................Second Respondent

JOHANNES H LOUW …................................................................................Third Defendant

THE ROAD ACCIDENT FUND …............................................................Fourth Respondent



Order





MIA (AJ)


Having regard to all the above the following orders are made:

1. The first applicant is granted leave in terms of Uniform Rule 13 (3)(b) to serve the third party notice on the fourth respondent.

2. The first applicant is granted leave in terms of Section 2 (4)(b) of the Apportionment of Damages Act, 1956 (Act No 34 of 1956) to deliver the notice in terms of section 2 (2) of the Apportionment of the Damages Act.

3. The second applicant is granted leave in terms of Uniform Rule 13 (3)(b) to serve the third party notice on the fourth respondent.

4. The second applicant is granted leave in terms of Section 2 (4)(b) of the Apportionment of Damages Act. 1956 (Act No 34 of 1956) to deliver the notice in terms of section 2 (2) of the Apportionment of the Damages Act.

5. The applicants shall pay the cost of this application and the first respondents wasted costs in the main action jointly and severally.


MIA AJ


29 July 2011