The corruption race in Africa: Nigeria versus South Africa, who cleans the mess first?
Prince Pius Imiera
LLB BL LLM, BA, MA Phil
Post Doctoral Research Fellow, University of South Africa, College of Law, Institute for Dispute Resolution in Africa

SUMMARY
The aim and objective of this article is to unpack in a comparative format the fiend of corruption in Africa, using Nigeria and South Africa as the giant in corruption alongside Somalia, South Sudan and Madagascar in the continent of Africa. It is true that corruption has been imported and/or incorporated into the African political space; although, the dimension and effects of corruption differ from country to country in Africa. In Africa, corruption is clearly visible culminating in several high-profile scandals standing out. In Nigeria for instance, former and late military head of State, Sani Abacha and South Africa’s Jackie Selebi were some among many public office bearers indicted in corruption mess. Kofele-Kale noted that corruption is punishable in all African countries, prohibited in their Constitutions and in various regional and pan-African anti-corruption instruments. In fact, Africa’s leaders are concerned about the problem of corruption that hardly a day goes by without some government entity criticising corruption and its cancerous effects on African society, yet,  Africa has made little or no progress on this front.
The article examines corruption in Nigeria and South Africa and tries to find out which of these two countries will be first in the complete eradication of corruption.

1 Introduction
Corruption is endemic and has become part of every day routine in the continent of Africa, this is no longer news. What may be news however to the international communities and Africa is that the evil of corruption has been completely wiped out in Africa and has become history because:
“As long as corruption continues to go largely unchecked, democracy is under threat around the world because corruption chips away at democracy to produce a vicious cycle, where corruption undermines democratic institutions, weak institutions are less able to control corruption, over and above this, with many democratic institutions under threat across the globe – often by leaders with authoritarian or populist tendencies – we need to do
more to strengthen checks and balances and protect citizens’ rights.”1

Transparency International, Corruption Perceptions Index 2018 (2019) 1.

How to cite: Imiera ‘The corruption race in Africa: Nigeria versus South Africa, who cleans the mess first?’ 2020 De Jure Law Journal 70-89
http://dx.doi.org/10.17159/2225-7160/2020/v53a5

The major and principal challenges confronting the African continent is the need to develop and sustain positive socio-economic results which
may lead to structural transformation processes.2 To achieve structural transformation  in  Africa,  three vital  requisites are  important  in this
regards: first, is good governance, which is extremely important; secondly, is that decision-making processes should be implemented by African leaders; and thirdly, Africa needs to keep up great administration and manufacture strong administration organisations, not exclusively to battle defilement, yet in addition to quicken and support its endeavors
towards social and financial improvement.3
As a corollary to the foregoing, the Africa agenda 2063 states unequivocally that:
“Africa shall be a continent where democratic values, culture, practices, universal principles of human rights, … justice and the rule of law are  entrenched.”4
In addition, institutional transformation for Africa’s development is very critical in wiping out corruption from Africa, this comes on the heels of the African Agenda 2063, which further affirms:
“Africa shall also have capable institutions and transformative leadership in place at all levels. Corruption and impunity will be a thing of the past.”5
Corruption is a social menace and global phenomenon, it is however  more pronounced in some jurisdictions than the other; for instance, corruption is more common in all African countries as shown in the  chart
below than in any other part of the world.6 Corruption through its perpetrators undermines and twists public policy leading to resource misallocation   which   ultimately   affects   private   sector   growth   and
produces negative economic effects that bring untold hardship and hurt the common man.7
The World Financial Institution (World Bank) perceives corruption as an international and domestic problem,8 individual wealth accumulation attitude by public office holders culminating in the misuse of public goods
for individual and/or private benefits and enrichment, this takes the form    of payment of bribes to bypass laid-down procedural principles. As a result, corruption becomes widespread in places where people in fiduciary trust and privileged positions monopolise the use of public funds to their advantage  in  the discharge  of  their  constitutional  duties  with  less  or no

United Nations Economic Commission for Africa Measuring corruption in Africa: The international dimension matters African Governance Report IV (2016) 2.
United Nations Economic Commission for Africa 2.
Agenda 2063 The Africa we want: The vision for 2063 Aspiration (2015) 5. 5 Agenda 2063 28-29.
Gamuchirai “Corruption in Africa: Implications for development” 2014 Polity 1.
Gamuchirai 1.
The World Bank Helping Countries Combat Corruption Operational (2000) 43.

accountability to tax payers, which results into  the  abuse  of  private gains.9 Although,  corruption  cuts  across  all  phases  of  human endeavour
globally, the impact is however felt by poorer and underdeveloped countries, particularly in Africa where corruption robs the commonwealth and brings  the diversion of public monies into private coffers to  the
impoverishment   of   the   people.10    In   general,   corruption  hinders
sustainable economic growth, peace and good governance. The former United Nations Secretary General, Ban-Ki Moon puts it succinctly in these words:
“We all know the heavy toll taken by corruption. More than a trillion dollars stolen or lost, every year-money needed for the Millennium Development Goals.”11
There are several types of corruptions: first is political corruption.Political corruption prevents the government from implementing, enforcing and upholding the rule of law; the second type of corruption is the one called the bureaucratic corruption which comes in the form of bribes collected by public office bearers to circumvent due diligence and process in the
public sector giving space to the violation of constitutional duties to the central government.12 The danger inherent in bureaucratic corruption is that it does not take into consideration the ability of governments to serve the people.13 The third type of corruption is the economic corruption where an insider of a particular organisation trades information and inflates tenders in exchange for financial gains, whilst disregarding due process in economic transactions.14
2 A brief overview of corruption in Africa
“If Africa fails to stop corruption, corruption is most likely going to stop Africa.”15
The Transparency International has asserted in many instances that Africa ranked highest in the world when it comes to corruption issues.16 The genesis of corruption in the continent is linked to the footprint of European
rule from slave trade and the industrial revolution in the nineteenth

Amundsen “Political Corruption: An Introduction to the Issues” 1999 Chr. Michelsen Institute Development Studies and Human Rights 7.
United Nations Economic Commission For Africa & African Union Advisory Board on Corruption “Combating Corruption, Improving Governance in Africa” Regional Anti-Corruption Programme for Africa (2011 – 2016) 3.
Ban Ki Moon The ONE campaign: the trillion dollar scandal (2014) 2.
United Nations Economic Commission 10.
United Nations Economic Commission 10.
Fitzsimons “Economic models of corruption” 2011 Researchgate 4.
Udombana “Fighting Corruption Seriously? Africa’s Anti-corruption Convention” Singapore Journal of  International  &  Comparative  Law  2003 447.
Transparency International Corruption Perceptions Index 2010 https:// www.transparency.org (accessed 2019-23-5).

century.17 The local leaders held powers for the colonial masters through indirect rule which in the final analysis turned leadership into a corrupted enterprise, the local leaders asked for money from the community with a
view to manipulating the bureaucratic process put in place by colonial administrators.18 The consequences of the institutionalised corrupt system was  where   self-enrichment   became   the  stock  in  trade  in  the African
continent and corruption increased progressively from one historical era  to another with the complex nature of corruption involving  finances being introduced in Africa through colonialism.19
Over and above the foregoing is that it has been estimated that corruption in Africa takes away about twenty to thirty percent of funds earmarked for basic service provision.20 In addition, African leaders
embezzled billions of dollars on a regular basis stashed away in foreign bank accounts.21
For instance, the UN estimated that African leaders siphoned more than $200 billion out of Africa in 1991.22 Scholars have argued that the 200 billion dollars stolen from Africa by corrupt leaders is far and above
of Africa’s foreign debt and that the money go far beyond the total amount of foreign aid to the whole of Africa put together.23
Corruption has caused and fueled organised violence through illegal utilisation of tax payers resources for private interests.24 This is the case in circumstances  where regulation of resources  is premised on  social
identities which creates uneven allocation of resources and/or inequalities that aggrieved unrecognised or marginalised groups.25 It has been argued that war economies, are built on corruption because the
conflicting parties depend on fraud, criminal partners who give and collect bribes to execute the conflicts, for instance through acquisition of ammunitions and weaponry.26 In September 2018 UN Security Council
through John Prendergast on anti-corruption asserted that “corruption

Elizabeth and Tenamwenye Corruption in Africa: A Threat to Justice and Sustainable Peace (2014) 20.
Gamuchirai 1.
Elizabeth 20.
AllAfrica.com Africa: Corruption Hampers MDGs – Transparency International http://allafrica.com/stories/201010271133.html (accessed 2019-23-5).
Oyedoyin James Ibori in final fall http://www.odili.net/news/source/2012/ apr/18/30.html (accessed 2019-23-5).
Owoye and Bissessar “Corruption in African countries: A Symptom of Leadership and Institutional Failure”  Challenges  to  Democratic  Governance in   Developing   Countries”    https://www.researchgate.net/.../265193869 Bad Governance and Corruption in Africa (accessed 2019-23-5).
Gbenga “Corruption and Development in Africa: Challenges for Political and Economic Change” 2007 Humanities and Social Sciences Journal 1-7.
Murimi “Policy Breifing Arresting corruption in Africa: Role of the youth”
2018 Institute for Security Studies 6.
Le Billon “Buying peace or fuelling war: The role of corruption in Armed conflicts” 2003 Journal of International Development 417.
Church “Lilies that fester: seeds of corruption and peacebuilding” 2009 New Routes Journal 3.

was at the root of the conflicts in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, South Sudan and the Central African Republic.”27
It is important to examine how citizens in Africa perceive how their governments are performing in respect to the war against corruption. In all of Africa, about sixty four percent of the populace are of the opinion that the various African governments are doing a poor job at handling
corruption, while only thirty two percent think that the governments are performing fairly or otherwise in the fight against corruption.28 It is submitted therefore that this poor evaluation of Africa’s leaders’ effort at
tackling corruption is indicative of the fact that more work need to be done by governments to clean up the public sector and bring corrupt officials to justice.
An examination at country-level evaluation in Africa showed that a small portion of governments are rated as doing well at cleaning up corruption; for example, the citizens of Botswana, Lesotho and Senegal agreed that their governments are doing well in eradicating corruption in
their countries.29 Outside of the three preceding African countries, all others scored very poor in terms of percentage in stopping corruption. Madagascar is the worst hit and most critical with ninety percent of the
people asserting that the leadership has done either fairly or very badly, reason being that over forty percent of Madagascar budget is lost to corruption.30
Nigeria is placed at 136th over 178 countries (Transparency International, 2017),31 South Africa, ranked 54 of the 178 countries,32 Zimbabwe, ranked 156th over 175 countries in Transparency International 2014 Corruption Perceptions Index,33  Liberia, ranked as
75th least corrupt out of 176 in the world and 11th in Africa,34 and in the
Benin Republic,35 only about 45% of the Beninese believed that the government is performing below expectation in respect of corruption.

Murimi 6.
Pring People and corruption: Africa survey global corruption barometer (2015) 9.
In Botswana 54% answered well, 42% badly; Lesotho 47% well,  41% badly; Senegal 47% well, 46% badly (2015) 10.
Freedom House (2015) Madagascar https://www.freedomhouse.org/report/ freedom world/2015/madagascar (accessed 2019-23-5).
Ojewale “In Nigeria, perceived corruption remains high despite praise for president’s anti-graftfight” 2018 Afrobarometer 1.
Policy briefing 14: Combating corruption in South Africa https:// www.democracyworks.org.za Programs Monitoring. (accessed 2019-23-5).
Ndoma “Zimbabweans see corruption on the increase, feel helpless to fight it” 2015 Afrobarometer 1.
Johnson Corruption remains a major problem in Liberia 2012 CENTAL Heritage 11.
Chêne “Overview of corruption and anti-corruption in Benin” 2014
Transparency International 1.

3 African Union anti-corruption legal documents
The African Union and the Regional Economic Communities have tried to address corruption in Africa and in its Agenda 2063, the African Union desires an Africa where corruption will be history.36 In line with the AU
Agenda 2063 with a view to eradicating corruption in Africa, the Convention on Preventing and Combating Corruption was adopted in 2003 and became operational in 2006.37 The 2006 Convention created the African Union Advisory Board on Corruption.38 The Board inter alia is saddled with the responsibility of promoting the adoption and application of anti-corruption measures in African countries and further
render advise to governments on how to deal with corruption challenges at the national level.39
In addition to the AU Convention 2006, the following legal instruments were introduced to compliment the Convention. The African Charter on Democracy, Elections and Governance;40 the African Union Convention on Values and Principles of Public Service and Administration;41 the African Charter on the Values and Principles of Decentralisation, Local Governance and Local Development;42 and; the African Union Declaration on the Principles Governing Democratic Elections in Africa.43
The Economic Community of West African States Protocol on the Fight against Corruption,44 and the Southern African Development Community Protocol Against Corruption,45 were also adopted at the regional level. It is submitted at this juncture that all of these instruments on corruption are intended to yield positive outcomes in the pursuit of AU Agenda  2063;  however,  the  task  remains  on  how  to  ensure  the
continental principles enshrined in these legal frameworks are achieved through   efficacious   and   constructive   implementation   by African

Agenda 2063.
Adopted on 11 July 2003 and came into force on 5 August 2006.
Created on the 26 May 2009 under Article 22(1) of the Convention.
Art 22(5) of the African Union Convention on Preventing and Combating Corruption.
Contained in Art’s 2(9), 3(9), 27(5) and 33(3) of African Charter on Democracy, Elections and Governance.
Contained in Art 12 of the AU Convention on Preventing and Combating Corruption.
Contained in Art 14 of the AU Convention on Preventing and Combating Corruption.
Paragraph III (g) of the AU Declaration on the Principles Governing Democratic Elections in Africa.
Economic Community of West African States Protocol on the Fight against Corruption (ECOWAS Protocol) was signed on 21 December 2001.
Protocol Against Corruption 2001. The SADC Protocol Against Corruption aims to promote and strengthen the development, within each Member State, of mechanisms needed to prevent, detect, punish and eradicate  corruption in the public and private sector.

countries who are signatories to these statutes.The political will to combat the monster called corruption is a vital and critical instrumentality in effective implementation. The quantum of laws do not deter corruption, it is the will and commitment by public officer bearers that can eradicate this social evil from the African societies.To corroborate this assertion, President Buhari opined that:
“In Nigeria, there are enough laws, rules, regulations on good governance, anti-corruption commissions and agencies and there is perhaps no need for more. What is required, is to strengthen, adequately fund and motivate existing institutions to do their jobs.”46

4 Corruption in South Africa
According to the mid-year 2018 reports, Statistics South Africa (Stats SA) puts the South African population at 57,73 million,47 and corruption along side with unaccountable government is noticeable both in the  public and private sectors.48 The current situation in South Africa is reflected in SA’s rankings in international indices and other reports on corruption in the media.49 One must however say at this point that there are some proofs of anti-corruption efforts in South Africa, one of which  is the present Raymond Zondo Commission of Enquiry.50
The South African authorities have continuously made unrelented moves and quality commitments to fighting corruption in South Africa, this move is reflected in the SA’s government’s statement on Anti-
Corruption Summit in 2016 in the UK.51 It is interesting to note that SA is one of the founders of the Open Government Partnership (OGP),52 and a member of the G20 group of nations.53

President Muhammadu Buhari “My plan to fight corruption in Nigeria” Against Corruption: A collection of essays, 12 May 2016. https:// www.gov.uk/ government/ publications/against corruption-a-collection-of-essays/against- corruption-a-collection-of-essays#contents (accessed 2019-24-5).
Stats SA Mid-year population estimates 2018 1.
Van Schalkwykm“Open data and the fight against corruption in South Africa” 2017 4.
South Africa remains among the world’s most corrupt countries. This is after the country ranked 73rd in the 2018 Corruption Perceptions Index released by Transparency International. The Index uses a scale of 0 to 100, where 0 is highly corrupt and 100 is very clean. South Africa had a score of 43 and was placed 9th in Sub-Saharan Africa which is ranked as the worst performing region in the world. The most un-corrupt countries are Denmark and New Zealand and the most corrupt Somalia, Syria and South Sudan. https://www.sabcnews.com/Home/Homepage Featured Story Slider (accessed 2019-24-5).
The Raymond Zondo Commission was appointed on 23 January 2018 by former president Jacob Zuma in terms of section 84(2)(f) of South Africa’s Constitution. Its purpose is to investigate allegations of state capture, corruption and fraud in the public sector, including organs of state.
UK anti-corruption summit: South Africa's statement - Corruption Watch https://www.corruptionwatch.org.za/uk-anti-corruption-summit-south- africas-statement (accessed 2019-24-5).

Although, SA is member of the OGP, it does not have a defined and identified open data policy and the SA government has not signed the
International Open Data Charter.54 However, the only domestic  open data  and  anti-corruption  policy  in  SA  is  captured  in  the  National
Development Plan: Vision for 2030.55
The SA’s National Development Plan is one of the few documents with a defined focus as regards open data and anti-corruption issues.56 In addition to the NDP, there is the National Integrated ICT information and communication technologies Policy White Paper,57 released in 2016.58 The principal objective of the National Integrated ICT is to provide the direction for the implementation of SA government’s commitment to open governance and open data.59
In its third Open Government Partnership National Action Plan, SA showed signs of commitment by incorporating both the open data and anti-corruption policy into three segments
“open budgeting, which commits to making information publicly available via an accessible platform that allows citizens to track government spending; a national open data portal, to increase government transparency; and beneficial ownership transparency.”60

The Open Government Partnership was founded on 20 September, 2011. The Open Government Partnership is a multilateral initiative that aims to secure concrete commitments from national and subnational governments to promote open government, empower citizens, fight corruption, and harness new technologies to strengthen governance. Other founding members are: United States, United Kingdom, Mexico, Philippines, Brazil, Indonesia, Norway and South Africa.
Founded on 26 September 1999. As of 2017 there are 20 members of the group: Argentina, Australia, Brazil, Canada, China, the European Union, France, Germany, India, Indonesia, Italy, Japan, Mexico, Russia, Saudi Arabia, South Africa, South Korea, Turkey, the United Kingdom, and the United States.
Out of a total of 54 countries in Africa, only ten countries had held open data events, these countries include Liberia, Rwanda, Burkina Faso, Uganda, and Ghana. https://www.od4d.net/files/reportiodc-2016-web.pdf. (accessed 2019-24-5).
National Development Plan: Vision for 2030: Our future: Make it work. https://www.poa.gov.za/.../NPC%20National%20Development%20Plan% 20Vision%202... (accesed 2019-24-5).
National Planning Commission, National Development Plan: Vision for 2030 (Pretoria: National Planning Commission, 2011), 408, https:// www.gov.za/sites/ www.gov.za/files/devplan_2.pdf. (accessed 2019-24-5).
Department of Telecommunications and Postal Services,  National Integrated ICT Policy White Paper (Pretoria: Department of Telecom- munications and Postal Services, 2016) https://www.dtps.gov.za/images/ phocagallery/Popular_Topic_Pictures/National_Integrated_ICT_Policy_Whi te.pdf (accessed 2019-24-5).
Fin24Tech Cabinet Finally Approves SA ICT Policy 29 September 2016 https://www.fin24.com/Tech/News/cabinet-finally-approves-sa-ict-policy- 20160929 (accessed 2019-24-5).
Department of Telecommunications and Postal Services (2016) 117.

In assessing the South African government’s activities in general with regard to the performance and commitments to the G20 Principles, one cannot but come to the sad conclusion that South Africa as a country has not faired or done well at the national space in translating the war against corruption into alreity. This conclusion comes on the heels of the fact that no alleged public officers in South Africa, whether serving or retired has been brought to justice or convicted by a court of competent jurisdiction. It is submitted therefore that, in the absence of a stronger political governance and the de-institutionalisation of corruption,  the  transparency policy being pursued by South Africa by open government
data will not result into accountability. It is hoped and believed that as South Africa’s sixth administration comes into effect on the 25th of May 2019 and after the May 8th general elections respectively, positive and drastic measures will be taken to fight corruption to a stand still in South Africa.
The exact cost of corruption in South Africa is not certain, there are however some institutions such as Corruption Watch and Civil Society Organizations (CSOs) that are unequivocal that corruption is endemic across government parastatals in South Africa; as a result, there is no
accountability.61    Corruption   in   SA   takes   different   dimensions and
narratives and these include but are not limited to: gross financial misadministration, fraud, political interference in the recruitment of public   sector   employees,   fraudulent   representations  by executive
members of their qualifications, procurement  irregularities  and bribery.62 The foregoing assertions are corroborated by South Africa’s position in international indicators in corruption matters;63 to this end, corruption is pervasive and systemic in South Africa.64 Although, there is
no  specific  sector and  no  evidential  proof  to  buttress the selection   of
certain sectors as highly affected, corruption is nonetheless clearly visible in the health sector,65 with Corruption Watch reporting in  2015 corruption in education (16%in total), traffic licensing (12%) and immigration (6%).66

Open Government Partnership The 3rd South African Open Government Partnership Country Action Plan 2015–2017 (Washington, DC: Open Government Partnership, 2015) https://www.opengovpartnership.org/sites/ default/files/South_Africa_Third_%20AP.docx (accessed 2019-24-5).
Africa Check https://africacheck.org/reports/has-sa-lost-r700-billion-to- corruption-since-1994why-the-calculation-is-wrong (accessed 2019-27-5).
Open Government Partnership, South Africa Progress Report 2013–2014: Second Progress Report (Washington, DC: Open Government Partnership, Independent	Reporting	Mechanism,	2014)	23	https://www.open govpartnership.org/sites/default/files/IRMReport_SouthAfrica_final.pdf (accessed 2019-27-5).
Transparency International’s Transparency Index available https:// www.transparency.org/cpi2015#results-table, the World  Justice Project’s Rule of Law Index http://data.worldjusticeproject.org/#/groups/ZAF and the Afrobarometer available http://afrobarometer.org/ (accessed 2019-27-5).
Merchant “A Captured State?” in Carbone South Africa: The Need for Change
(2016) 54.
Rispel “Exploring Corruption in the South African Health Sector” 2015
Health Policy and Planning 239–249.

In addition to the above claims, The Organisation Undoing Tax Abuse (OUTA) points its fingers to entities like Eskom, the African electricity public utility, established in 1923 as the Electricity Supply Commission by the government of South Africa, South Africa Airways, the South
African Broadcasting Corporation and the South African National Roads Agency.67 In fact, the SA Auditor-General unpacked that there has been increase in reckless transactions from 2007 to 2015, with much of the unaccounted-for expenditure taking place at the subnational levels.68 With that being said, there are several key legislations to combat corruption and robust legislative frameworks to root out corruption in
South Africa. These legislations just to mention a few are: the Prevention and Combating of Corrupt Activities Act 2004; being the vital law on corruption in South Africa, and the Promotion of Access to Information Act 2000, which gives effect to the constitutional right of South Africans
to access government-held information.69
5 South Africa Corruption Index
Transparency International scored South Africa only 43 points over 100 in the 2018 Corruption Perceptions Index, which on average gives South Africa only 46.62 scores from 1996 until 2018 as reflected in the chat
below, which is about 56.80 scores in 1996 and a record low of 41 scores in 2011.70

Corruption Watch Amp Up the Volume: Annual Report 2015 (Johannesburg: Corruption Watch, 2016), https://www.corruptionwatch.org.za/wp-content/ uploads/2016/03/Corruption-Watchannual-report-2015.pdf (accessed 2019- 27-5).
Van Schalkwyk 12.
Merchant 54.
Van Schalkwyk 68.
South Africa Corruption Index 2019 https://www.tradingeconomics.com/ South Africa (accessed 2019-21-5).

6 Corruption in Nigeria
“Unlimited power is apt to corrupt the minds of those who posses it; and this I know, my lords: that where laws end, tyranny begins.”71
It is no longer news that one of the social menace and phenomenon confronting the entire human race is corruption, and Nigeria is no exception  in  the  sense  that  this  monster  evil  called  corruption has
manifested in all areas of national life in Nigeria.72 Pre and post independence Nigeria on October 1st 1960, every administration has
promised to address corruption, up until now, there been no serious progress made in this regard.73
Like South Africa, corruption manifests itself in every facet of public and private sector in Nigeria since 1960. The Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) is one of the anti-corruption agencies in Nigeria, in 2012 asserts as follows:
“corruption in the public sector remains a sore spot in Nigeria’s quest to instil transparency and accountability in the polity. The failure to deliver social services, the endemic problem of the power supply and the collapse of infrastructure are all linked with corruption.”74
Lamenting the effect and evil of corruption in societal underdevelopment, the late Kofi Anan said:
“This evil phenomenon (corruption) is found in all countries – big and small, rich and poor – but it is in the developing world that its effects are most  destructive. Corruption hurts the poor disproportionately – by diverting funds intended for development, undermining a government’s ability to provide basic services, feeding inequality and injustice, and discouraging foreign investment and aid. Corruption is a key element in economic underperformance, and a major obstacle to poverty alleviation and
development.”75
Over the years, the quality of life of the common man in Nigeria has been and is still negatively impacted by corrupt leaders through corruption in Nigeria. In this regard, the general opinion across Nigeria is that corruption is traceable to all tiers of governments in the country because
Nigeria is famous for high profile corruption.76

Ogbeid “Political Leadership and Corruption in Nigeria Since 1960: A Socio- economic Analysis” 2012 Journal of Nigeria Studies 1.
Adesina “Nigeria and the burden of corruption” 2016 Canadian Social Science 12.
Tignor “Political corruption in Nigeria before independence” 1993 The Journal of Modern African Studies 176.
Ishaka “Corruption, conflict and national development in Nigeria” 2018
Veritas international journal of entrepreneurship development 16-17.
Anan United Nations Convention Against Corruption (2004) iii.
Amundsen Good governance in Nigeria a study in political economy and donor support (2010) 1.

The former military head of state and also President of Nigeria for two consecutive terms who himself is not free from corruption, Olusegun Obasanjo abridged the corruption scenario in Nigeria in the following words:
“The story of my country Nigeria is fairly well known. Until 1999, the country had practically institutionalized corruption as the foundation of governance. Hence institutions of society easily decayed to unprecedented proportions as opportunities were privatized by the powerful. This  process  was accompanied, as to be expected, by the intimidation of the judiciary, the subversion of due process, the manipulation of existing laws and regulations, the suffocation of civil society, and the containment of democratic values and institutions. Power became nothing but a means of accumulation and subversion as productive initiatives were abandoned for purely administrative and transactional activities. The legitimacy and stability of the state became
compromised as citizens began to devise extra-legal and informal ways of survival. All this made room for corruption.”77
The Nigeria corruption situation, just like in Madagascar, South Africa, Somalia and Tanzania, can best be qualified as the criteria of systemic corruption, reason being that corruption is a daily life occurrence in Nigeria, it is tolerated, accepted, and institutionalised in a greater proportion in a way that both the giver and receiver of bribes have
internalised and supported that behaviour.78
The major hot spots in corruption in Nigeria is identified in the following areas but are not limited to the following:
“intentional distortion of financial records; misappropriation of assets whether or not accompanied by distortion of statement; payment for contracts of jobs not executed; ten percent kick backs from contracts awarded; intentional loss of receipts and mutilation of account documents; insertion of fictitious names in the payment voucher and the amount involved paid to unauthorized persons; using government official letter head paper to order for goods for private use purporting that it belongs to
government; paying public cheques into private account for any reason best known to the officer.”79

7 Nigeria corruption Index
The 2018 Corruption Perception Index puts Nigeria at 144 least corrupt nation out of 175 countries as shown below, according to Transparency International. This means that corruption rank in Nigeria on the average

Obasanjo Nigeria: From pond of corruption to island of integrity a lecture delivered by him at the 10th Anniversary Celebration of Transparency International, Berlin, November, 7 2003.
Aluko “The institutionalization of corruption and its impact on political culture and behaviour in Nigeria” 2002 Nordic Journal of African  Studies 396.
Agenyi “Corruption in some public sectors: Implications for sustainable socio-economic development in Nigeria” 2009 NASHER Journal 128- 134.

is 121.48% from 1996 until 2018, culminating in an all high level of 152 in 2005 and a record low of 52 in 1997.80

8 Cleaning corruption mess in Africa
The African Union has provided both legal and institutional mechanisms in its Convention to combat corruption in Africa, it is noted however that
these mechanisms provided by the AU may not be able to achieve this aim since corruption is systemic in Africa.81 Legal and institutional mechanisms must combine with collective involvement of all people;  put
differently, there must be social involvement or social empowerment in the fight against corruption.82 Social empowerment includes the protection of political and economic resources available to ordinary citizens.83 Additionally, social empowerment involves making sure that civil society is fortified with a view to strengthening political and economic vitality which ultimately culminates in providing an orderly routes of access and rules of interaction between state and society.84 It is submitted that in circumstances where social empowerment succeeds, it may not completely eradicate corruption, it will however provide the
necessary support for institutional reforms and help institutionalise reform for the long term by linking it to lasting interests contending in active political and social processes.85

Nigeria Corruption Rank 2019 Data https://www.tradingeconomics.com/ Nigeria (accessed 2019-27-5).
Opeoluwa A Human Rights Approach To Combating Corruption In Africa: Appraising The AU Convention Using Nigeria And South Africa (LLM dissertation 2005 UP) 34.
Johnston “The Search for Definitions: The Vitality of Politics and the Issue of Corruption” 1996 International Social Science Journal 85-104.
Johnston 85.
Johnston 83.
Johnston 83.

9 Approaches to cleaning up corruption in Nigeria and South Africa
9 1 The fourth industrial revolution approach (4IR)
The fourth industrial revolution, (4IR) explains and depicts a situation where people move between artificial intelligence (AI) and offline  reality
with the assistance of interlinked technology which helps humans to manage their daily lives and activities.86 The various industrial revolutions have chronicled chequered history. The (1STIR) changed the course of human history and economy from an agrarian and handicraft economy to that of industry and machine manufacturing dominance; the (2ndIR) brought with it oil and electricity which fastened abundance of production; while the (3rdIR) ensured that (IT) information technology
was  utilised  to  automate  production.87  It  is  submitted  that,  each
industrial revolution is viewed as a separate advent, however, all the three revolutions are perceived as several phenomena building upon the creativity of the previous revolution which brings with it more advanced forms of production.
In line with the 4IR, the University of Pretoria (UP) has become the first University in the continent of Africa to hire the services of the first client robot working at the University library; according to UP, “the introduction  of  the  robotic  librarian  is  in  keeping  with  its  focus  on
evolving  in line  with the  fourth industrial revolution.”88  In addition, UP
hosted its Tuks Robot Race Day, with over seventy autonomous robotic vehicles competing for sports. The robotic librarian is called Libby, it interacts with all the library users and visitors on wheelchairs.89 Libby
commenced employment in the UP main library on Tuesday, 28 May 2019, “having over 60 sensors, cameras and software integrations that enable her to receive and process various commands and requests. She boasts a tablet integrated on her chest area for manual input. Her brain    is  connected  to  Watson,  IBM’s  question-answering  computer  system,
which processes queries directed at Libby.”90
Without advocating for the loss of employment to robots in the public and private sectors of the economy, Nigeria and South Africa can borrow a leaf from the University of Pretoria and take advantage of the 4IR by robotising all of their governments institutions to monitor and report cases and incidents of corruption or even the intent to perpetrate corrupt act; South Africa can install the use of robots in all of its chapter nine
institutions,91 and other state owned enterprises (SOEs) in the country,92

Miller “Natural Language: The User Interface for the Fourth Industrial Revolution” 2016 Opus Research Report 3.
Min Xu The Fourth Industrial Revolution: Opportunities and Challenges 2018 International Journal of Financial Research 90.
Admire “University of Pretoria employs Watson-powered robotic” 2019 1.
Admire 1.
Admire 1.

while Nigeria can do same in all of its government parastatals.93 This will ensure governmental openness and fidelity at all spheres of government because before corruption takes place, the robots would have exposed the fraud and the officials involved.

Prof. Tawana Kupe, University of Pretoria vice-chancellor and principal, with Libby in South Africa,94

As can be seen above, Prof. Kupe interacting with Libby for a possible instruction on the task the VC wants Libby to carry out for him.
9 2 The print, electronic and other social media platform approach
All forms of media act as institution for checks and balances in all facet of societal activities because the media can curb corruption.95 On top of this, modern societies and the media serve as external monitor  in  fighting corruption.96 The media further ensures compliance with procedural, democratically enacted legislations, values, and norms.

Chapter 9 State Institutions Section 181(1) of the South African Constitution.
Sturesson State-Owned Enterprises Catalysts for public value creation? (2015) 1.
Broadcasting Organisation of Nigeria (BON), Bureau Public Enterprises (BPE), Bureau of Public Procurement (BPP), Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) etc.
Admire 1.
Christopher “Free to Expose Corruption: The Impact of Media Freedom, Internet Access, and Governmental Online Service Delivery on Corruption” 2016 International Journal of Communication 4702–4703.
Brunetti “A free press is bad news for corruption” 2003 Journal of Public Economics 1803.

Although, the media does not possess the constitutional legitimacy and powers like the three arms of government to impose sanction for the
misconduct of corrupt public officials; they however influence public control indirectly,97 by holding political decision makers accountable for their actions;98 strengthen checks and balances between  equally  powerful actors i.e horizontal accountability;99 providing a civic forum
for   voicing   complaints   and   contribute   to   forming   public opinion;
providing information about corruption, contributing to a general climate of transparency within society, curbing corruption on both systemic and individual levels;100 by having a preventive effect and highlighting the
magnitude of external rewards through bribes and high severity of punishment.101
Finally, a nation communicates with itself and the rest of the world through the mass media because it is through the media  authorities  within a state sense and see the challenges and desires of the people they are constitutionally and democratically legitimised to serve. On the other hand, it is through the media that the citizens notice the strength, power, sincerity, capacity and policies of those in the position of authority because
“A popular government without popular information or the means of acquiring it is but a prologue to a farce or a tragedy; or perhaps both. Knowledge will forever govern ignorance; and a people who mean to be their own governors must arm themselves with the power that knowledge
brings.”102
9 3 Philosophical approaches to cleaning up corruprion
The motivation to clean up corruption from Nigeria and South Africa in particular and in Africa in general require effective, accountable leadership and political will rather than by actual or real interest in the
efficacy of a country’s political and economic institutions;103 reason being that “corruption goes with power … therefore to hold any useful discussion on corruption; we must first locate it where it properly belongs
– in the ranks of the powerful.”104

Stapenhurst “The Media’s Role in Curbing Corruption” 2000 World bank institute 20-21.
Norris “Giving voice to the voiceless: Good governance, human  development & mass communications” 2002 New York, NY: United Nations Development Programme 15.
Camaj “The media’s role in fighting corruption: Media effects on governmental   accountability”   2012   The   International   Journal   of   Press/ Politics 26-27.
Kolstad “Is transparency the key to reducing corruption in resource-rich countries?” 2009 World Development 521–532.
Becker Crime and punishment: An economic approach (1974) in Becker,
Essays in the economics of crime and punishment 1–54.
Kilimwiko “The Role of the Media in Fighting Corruption” in Investigative Journalism in Tanzania 1996 Arusha Tanzania 73.
	John “Bureaucratic Corruption in Africa: The Futility of Cleanups” 1996 The Cato journal 7.

Under this segment, the article tries to argue and elucidate the real character of corruption using philosophical approaches.
9 3 1 Utilitarian approach to eradicating corruption
The utilitarians are of the view that human beings should behave or act in a moral way that will result in the best outcomes.105 On the other hand, the deontologists maintain that people should adhere to certain rules with a view to militating against acts of corruption.106
The utilitarian approach emphasises greatest happiness for the majority of the people, it can be deduced therefore that anyone cut in an act of corruption will give little or no attention to any laws and rules forbidding corruption because actions are considered right when they produce happiness, not the doer’s happiness, but the greatest amount of
happiness altogether for the populace.107 To this end, actions are right when the actions result into or promote happiness and the actions are wrong  when  the  actions  do  not  promote  happiness.108   The logical
conclusion from the preceding argument is that if corruption does not advance pleasure or prohibit pain for the commonwealth good they are not morally wrong from a utilitarian point of view and the utilitarians
would say that corruption is valid when it benefits more individuals in a society than it harms.109
9 3 2 Deontological approach to eradicating corruption
The deontologists believe that in matters relating to corruption, the judge or the court will consider the issues differently, depending on the rules of reasoning or interpretation of the relevant laws. To the deontologists, rules, commandments, laws and codes of practice act as  moral compasses, as a result, deontologists ascribe to strict rule-based morals when dealing with public monies. It is for this reason that Blanchard opined that:
“Deontologists have shown a fidelity to actual moral judgment that is probably closer than that of any other contemporary school. They have argued with great force that moral judgments are really judgments, not expressions of feelings only, and here − for whatever it is worth − common
sense is undoubtedly on their side.”110

Achebe The trouble with Nigeria 1993 http://www.vanguardngr.com/2013/ 05/achebe-the-icon-and-greatest-anti-corruptioncrusader/ (accessed 2019-4- 6).
The most important classical utilitarians are Jeremy Bentham (1748-1832) and John Stuart Mill (1806-1873).
Vorster “Fighting corruption – a philosophical approach” 2003 Die Skriflig/ In Luce Verbi 651.
Mill Utilitarianism (1907) 9.
Mill 108.
Ashley “A bitter pill must be swallowed: An ethics based view of corruption” 2013 Arkansas Journal of Social Change and Public Service 1.
Vorster “Fighting Corruption- A philosophical Approach” 2013 In die Skriflig/ In Luce Verbi 47(1) 4.

From the above reasoning, it is submitted that, a deontological perception of corruption requires a meticulous care to moral norms and their relation to conscience in the human mind.

10 Way forward in Nigeria and South Africa: developing a corruption plan
Corruption builds and brings an environment that becomes corruption- friendly.111 In Nigeria,112 and SA,113 the endemic poverty, collapsed public institutions and the decaying moral values must be viewed and
perceived against the backdrop of the desires for materialistic gains by few individuals in the position of authority. The role anti-corruption mechanisms have played in the fight against corruption cannot be over emphasised by adopting preventive measures in addition to criminal law measures, creating a mutual evaluation mechanism to monitor implementation and encourage international  cooperation,  and recognising  the  important  role  for  civil  society  in  the  fight  against
corruption,114   however  it  is  imperative  to  stress  that  a  long-term
programme is required to improve and strengthen moral renewal and awareness of the entire population in Nigeria and South Africa. Creating awareness and moral renewal will require a well-informed programme managed by the government with special contributions by the civil society directed towards in inculcating values and practices built on honesty, integrity and responsibility. Although, a corruption prevention programme is a proactive idea modelled to radically reduce corruption,   it does not completely eradicate the incidence of corruption in any  society or organisation. Precedent upon the foregoing, the paper reproduces  verbatim  the  understated  programme  plan  for  Nigeria and
South Africa.115
10 1 The offender
This refers to the corrupt person, i.e. the person who demands and receives bribes or gratification for carrying out his normal paid duties. A corruption prevention plan developed in line with the offender would see to it that they would be caged through laws and rules making it difficult for them to intervene in official business. Similarly, the strict  enforcement of the laws and rules in official business must be a priority.

Vorster 7.
Rawlings “Understanding Corruption in Nigeria and its Implications to National Security and Sustainable Development” 2013 IOSR Journal Of Humanities And Social Science 64.
Manyaka “The Phenomenon of Corruption in the South African Public Sector: Challenges and Opportunities” 2014 Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences 1572.
Brandolino “Fighting corruption: The role of diplomacy and International agreements” 2001 The journal of public inquiry 11-12.
Mclaughlin and Muncie Controlling Crime (2001) 62-63.

10 2 The victim
This refers to the person who (in the case of bribery for instance) gives either willingly or unwillingly. The victim is often forgotten or even neglected in the incidence of bribery, as an aspect of corruption. However, without willing or comprising victim there would be no corruption in the first place. Developing a prevention plan along this line would encompass clearly laid out and strictly enforced sanctions against victims in corruption cases. It is important to add that the victim may be the society, organisation, or the citizenry. The problem in this case is that the application of sanctions is usually difficult as the ‘victim’ here may not even be aware of what is going on. In other words, there are instances where gullible persons are made “victims” thereby suffering what they are unaware of.
3 The environment/community
This refers to the place where corruption takes place. It can be the office, church, school, the community or indeed the highway. Developing corruption prevention plan in this section would centre on giving officials better incentives such as improved salaries, allowances and promotions as when due. Again, this should be explicitly formulated code of conducts
with sever and swift execution of sanctions.116
Conclusion
“By justice a king gives a country stability, but those who are greedy for bribes tear it down.”117
Reducing corruption to a sustainable level is feasible in Nigeria and South Africa, however, it requires a direct attack because systemic and institutional challenges require a solid social grounding to succeed and sustain over a long period of time; in this connection, fight against corruption does not require only the ability to detect, deter and punish
corrupt acts but also needs the long-term formulation of a system of public order and transparency in government.118
The article provided an analysis of the corruption clean up in Africa, using Nigeria and South Africa as the case study. Corruption exists in Nigerian and South African public sectors is no longer news, but what may be news are the problems and opportunities that could be harnessed more beneficially to bring to the barest minimum the extent and level of corruption in both countries. In addition, the paper also agrees that both Nigeria and South Africa public sectors have sound legal frameworks and strategies to fight corruption to a stand still, but the problem remains the

Mclaughlin 3.
The King James Bible Proverbs Chapter twenty nine verse four.
Antonio “The Global Programme Against Corruption” 2004 United Nations Anti-corruption Toolkit 22.

failure to comply with those processes and procedures as a result of the insufficient governmental dedication and devotion that provides chances for immoral, unlawful and/or corrupt practices.119
The article argued that corruption poses a serious obstacle to sustainable economic, political and social progress in the African continent in general but to Nigeria and South Africa in particular in every areas of development. Corruption has eroded transformation and competitiveness in Nigeria and South Africa, thereby giving space to
bribery.120 Governments officials divert public funds meant for the promotion of the wellbeing of people for their individual purposes. As a result of what has been said, corruption has brought severe and acute
growth in income and wealth inequality for many years in both countries under examination. On top of this, it was submitted that corruption in a greater dimension will hindering the possibility of achieving the 2030 Sustainable Development Agenda. This is corroborated with the need to intensify concerted drive to improve leadership frameworks, strengthen actions to hold public servants accountable, to improve, prevent, detect and sanction corruption by all means possible. It was also opined that the fight against corruption requires all hands to be on deck which must be approached holistically with coordinated efforts.
Finally, the role of the media is vital in creating public awareness, promote integrity, detect, and report acts of corruption. The media owe an obligation to the people they serve because a successful action against corruption depends on the information disseminated by the media. To this end, media gives information on corruption, its sources, repercussion and possible solutions; additionally, media can investigate, detect and report incidences of corruption, bringing corruption cases into
the public space and instituting judicial prosecution.121

Manyaka 1579.
Angel “Putting an end to corruption” 2016 Organisation for economic co- operation and development 1.
Organisation for economic co-operation and development (OECD) (2018), The Role of the Media and Investigative Journalism in Combating Corruption https://www.oecd.org/corruption/The-roleof-media-and-investi gative-journalism-in-combatingcorruption.htm (accessed 2019-6-6).