South Africa: North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria Support SAFLII

You are here:  SAFLII >> Databases >> South Africa: North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria >> 2016 >> [2016] ZAGPPHC 62

| Noteup | LawCite

Mogabudima Transport Services CC and Others v Gauteng Provincial Regulatory Entity and Others (23846/2014) [2016] ZAGPPHC 62 (28 January 2016)

Download original files

PDF format

RTF format


REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA

(GAUTENG DIVISION, PRETORIA)

28/01/2016

CASE NO: 23846/2014

NOT REPORTABLE

NOT OF INTEREST TO OTHER JUDGES

 

In the matter between:

 

MOGABUDIMA TRANSPORT SERVICES CC SE MOGOWE                        1st Applicant

J MOGOWE                                                                                                    2nd Applicant

ME NCHABELENG                                                                                         3rd Applicant

JM SEPHEU                                                                                                     4th Applicant

MP NCHABELENG                                                                                          5th Applicant

GJ MTHOBENI                                                                                                6th Applicant

MF NTSOANE                                                                                                  7th Applicant

SD RANALA                                                                                                    8th Applicant

OL MOTAU                                                                                                      9th Applicant

RS SELLO                                                                                                     10th Applicant

ME LEPELLE                                                                                                 11th Applicant

KT CHOMA                                                                                                    12th Applicant

MJ KGATUKE                                                                                                13th Applicant

MB PHASHA                                                                                                  14th Applicant

 

And

 

THE GAUTENG PROVINCIAL REGULATORY ENTITY                             1st Respondent

THE LIMPOPO PROVINCIAL REGULATORY ENTITY                             2nd Respondent

THE REGISTRAR OF TRANSPORT,

GAUTENG  PROVINCE                                                                              3rd Respondent

THE REGISTRAR OF TRANSPORT,

LIMPOPO PROVINCE                                                                                4th Respondent

BOSEKA BOEJA TAXI ASSOCIATION                                                      5th Respondent

MASEMOLA TAXI ASSOCIATION                                                              6th Respondent

MV SEPHEU                                                                                               7th Respondent

SEFOKA MAKUWE ADAM                                                                         8th Respondent

NCHABELENG  DITEDI MAXWELL                                                           9th Respondent

TLADI FRANS                                                                                           10th Respondent

MA MOKGWADI                                                                                        11th Respondent

 

JUDGMENT

 

MALI AJ

[1] This is an application for an order to rescind, alternatively to declare void and unenforceable the verdict issued by the third and fourth respondents on 18 July 2012. The application further seeks the following:

1.1. an order directing the third respondent to reinstate the First applicants as members of the fifth respondent; and

1.2. an order directing the third respondent to reinstate the applicants as members of the fifth respondent and to renew their permits which they were entitled to as members of the fifth respondent.

[2] There was no appearance on behalf of all the applicants. I am satisfied that the notice of set down was served upon the applicants on 12 October 2015.

[3] Counsel, Mr Gwarha appeared on behalf of the 1st, 2nd, 3rd and 4th respondents. Counsel, Mr Morare appeared on behalf of 5th and 11th respondent.

[4] There was no appearance on behalf of 6th, 7th, 8th, 9th and the 10th respondent.

[5] Having heard Counsel the application is dismissed with costs.

5.1 Applicants are ordered to pay costs of 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th 5th and 11th respondents on attorney and client scale.

 

______________________________

MALI AJ ACTING JUDGE OF THE HIGH COURT

 

Counsel for the Applicants: Instructed by:

No appearance No appearance

 

Counsel for 1st, 2nd, 3rd and 4th Respondents:          MR GWARHU

Counsel for 5 and 11 th Respondents:                         RAMUSHU MORARE INC.

 

Date of Hearing: 14 October 2015

Date of Judgment: 29 January 2016